Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333815›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Revolutionizing snakebite care with novel antivenoms: Breakthroughs and barriers.

Samuel Odo Uko, Ibrahim Malami, Kasimu Ghandi Ibrahim, Nafiu Lawal, Muhammad Bashir Bello, Murtala Bello Abubakar, Mustapha Umar Imam

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Genotoxic Activity ofBiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Epitope-based antibody development against metalloproteinases and phospholipases AThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Samuel Odo UkoCentre for Advanced Medical Research and Training, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Nigeria.
Ibrahim MalamiCentre for Advanced Medical Research and Training, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Nigeria.
Kasimu Ghandi IbrahimDepartment of Basic Medical and Dental Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Zarqa University, P. O. Box 2000, Zarqa, 13110, Jordan.
Nafiu LawalCentre for Advanced Medical Research and Training, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Nigeria.
Muhammad Bashir BelloCentre for Advanced Medical Research and Training, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Nigeria.
Murtala Bello AbubakarCentre for Advanced Medical Research and Training, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Nigeria.
Mustapha Umar ImamCentre for Advanced Medical Research and Training, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Sokoto, Nigeria.
Usmanu Danfodiyo University · NGBaze University · NGKing Abdullah International Medical Research Center · SAZarqa University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakebite envenoming (SBE) is a global public health concern, primarily due to the lack of effective antivenom for treating snakebites inflicted by medically significant venomous snakes prevalent across various geographic locations. The rising demand for safe, cost-effective, and potent snakebite treatments highlights the urgent need to develop alternative therapeutics targeting relevant toxins. This development could provide promising discoveries to create novel recombinant solutions, leveraging human monoclonal antibodies, synthetic peptides and nanobodies. Such technologies as recombinant DNA, peptide and epitope mapping phage display etc) have the potential to exceed the traditional use of equine polyclonal antibodies, which have long been used in antivenom production. Recombinant antivenom can be engineered to target certain toxins that play a critical role in snakebite pathology. This approach has the potential to produce antivenom with improved efficacy and safety profiles. However, there are limitations and challenges associated with these emerging technologies. Therefore, identifying the limitations is critical for overcoming the associated challenges and optimizing the development of recombinant antivenoms. This review is aimed at presenting a thorough overview of diverse technologies used in the development of recombinant antivenom, emphasizing their limitations and offering insights into prospects for advancing recombinant antivenoms.

Indexed as

AntibodiesAntivenomNanobodiesRecombinant antivenomSnake venomTraditional antivenom

Identifiers

PMID38333815
PMCPMC10850593
OpenAlexW4391345362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.