ArticleHeliyon2024
Comparison of the stress distribution in base materials and thicknesses in composite resin restorations.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical evaluation of different bi-layer biomimetic strategies of composite resin in large class I cavities: an 18-month randomized clinical trial.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Effect of different onlay materials and resin core thickness on stress distribution in partial coverage restorations: a 3D finite element study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Comparison of fracture resistance among restorative techniques for endodontically treated mandibular premolars: an in vitro study.The Saudi dental journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Direct and Semi-Direct Composite Techniques in Posterior Teeth: A Two-Year Follow-Up Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Influence of thickness and base material in class II restorations with nanofilled composites: finite element study.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Biomechanical behavior of fiber-reinforced and bulk-fill composites in extensive class II restorations: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Various Cavosurface Margins in Class II Restorations Using 3D Finite Element Method.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Influence of Deep Margin Elevation Technique With Two Restorative Materials on Stress Distribution of e.max Endocrown Restorations: A Finite Element Analysis.International journal of dentistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resin-based composite materials are commonly used for restorations, but their dimensional changes during the polymerization could cause various clinical problems. This study evaluated the influence of a base of different materials and thicknesses on the stress magnitude and distribution in a second maxillary premolar with an MOD resin composite restoration using three-dimensional finite element analysis. A sound tooth without cavity was considered as the control group (ST), and another group was restored with composite resin without applying a base material in a MOD cavity (CR). The other three groups were restored with composite resin along with the following base materials: glass ionomer cement, low-viscosity resin, and tricalcium silicate, respectively (CR-GIC, CR-LR, and CR-TS). These three groups were further divided into two subgroups according to the thickness of the base layer: thin (0.5 mm) and thick (1.0 mm). The stress distribution was compared using the maximum principal stress after polymerization shrinkage and vertical loading with 600 N on the occlusal surface. Group ST showed the lowest stress value, and its stress propagation was confined to outer enamel surfaces only. Group CR demonstrated the highest stress distribution in the tooth-restoration interface with increased failure risk on marginal areas. The thin and thick subgroups of the three groups with a base layer had lower stress levels than Group CR. The base materials reduced the marginal stress caused by polymerization shrinkage of composite resin in MOD cavities. Different base materials and thicknesses did not affect the stress distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.