ArticleHeliyon2024
Development of a clinical prediction score for perioperative complications following metastatic spinal surgery (PERCOM) score.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal metastases can impair mobility, worsening the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). Surgery for spinal metastases has the potential to improve KPS and extend prognosis, but it is crucial to recognize the elevated risk of perioperative complications. Therefore, the development of a new scoring system to accurately predict perioperative complications in spinal metastatic surgery is essential. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study with 86 patients who underwent surgical intervention for spinal metastases. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of perioperative complications within 14 days after surgery. Various factors related to perioperative complications were assessed through univariate and multivariate analyses. We established a clinical prognostic scoring system called the Perioperative Complications following Metastatic Spinal Surgery (PERCOM) score and evaluated its precision using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Five variables (age, KPS, primary prostate cancer, Albumin, and Hemoglobin) identified in the univariate analysis were assigned binary values of 0 or 1. The PERCOM score was then calculated for each patient by summing the individual points, ranging from 0 to 5. The optimal threshold determined by ROC curve analysis for the PERCOM score was 2 points, with a sensitivity of 86 % and a specificity of 56 %. Conclusions: The composite PERCOM score effectively predicted perioperative complications in spinal metastasis surgery. To further validate its precision, a prospective multicenter study is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.