ReviewHeliyon2024
Radiomics advances in the evaluation of pancreatic cystic neoplasms.
Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence in pancreatic cyst characterization: future or fiction?Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Pancreas cystic lesion with surprise findings on confocal laser endomicroscopy.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025Article
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Pancreatic Cystic Fluid Biochemical and Genetic Analysis for the Differentiation Between Mucinous and Non-Mucinous Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Intracystic Glucose Measurement for On-Site Differentiation Between Mucinous and Non-Mucinous Pancreatic Cystic Lesions.Cancers · 2024Article
- An Overview for Clinicians on Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms (IPMNs) of the Pancreas.Cancers · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the development of medical imaging, the detection rate of pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCNs) has increased greatly. Serous cystic neoplasm, solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and mucinous cystic neoplasm are the main subtypes of PCN, and their treatment options vary greatly due to the different biological behaviours of the tumours. Different from conventional qualitative imaging evaluation, radiomics is a promising noninvasive approach for the diagnosis, classification, and risk stratification of diseases involving high-throughput extraction of medical image features. We present a review of radiomics in the diagnosis of serous cystic neoplasm and mucinous cystic neoplasm, risk classification of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and prediction of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm invasiveness compared to conventional imaging diagnosis. Radiomics is a promising tool in the field of medical imaging, providing a noninvasive, high-performance model for preoperative diagnosis and risk stratification of PCNs and improving prospects regarding management of these diseases. Further studies are warranted to investigate MRI image radiomics in connection with PCNs to improve the diagnosis and treatment strategies in the management of PCN patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.