Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333697›Full record

ArticleiScience2024

Loss of functional

Samantha E Iiams, Guijun Wan, Jiwei Zhang, Aldrin B Lugena, Ying Zhang, Ashley N Hayden, Christine Merlin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging tools to advance neuroethology in butterflies and moths.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Coevolution ofiScience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Samantha E IiamsDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Guijun WanDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Jiwei ZhangDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Aldrin B LugenaDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Ashley N HaydenDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Christine MerlinDepartment of Biology and Center for Biological Clocks Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Texas A&M University · USNanjing Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Light is one of the strongest cues for entrainment of circadian clocks. While some insect species rely only on visual input, others like

Indexed as

EntomologyNatural sciencesNeuroscienceZoology

Identifiers

PMID38333697
PMCPMC10850777
OpenAlexW4391057560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.