Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333610›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Validation of general pain scores from multidomain assessment tools in stroke.

Myzoon Ali, Holly Tibble, Marian C Brady, Terence J Quinn, Katharina S Sunnerhagen, Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian, Ashfaq Shuaib, Anand Pandyan, Gillian Mead

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Myzoon AliSchool of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Holly TibbleCentre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Marian C Brady *NMAHP Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Terence J Quinn *School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Katharina S Sunnerhagen *Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Gothenburg, Sweden and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian *Raffles Neuroscience Centre, Raffles Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Ashfaq Shuaib *Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Anand Pandyan *Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, Poole, United Kingdom.
Gillian Mead *Geriatric Medicine, Division of Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: We describe how well general pain reported in multidomain assessment tools correlated with pain-specific assessment tools; associations between general pain, activities of daily living and independence after stroke. Materials and methods: Analyses of individual participant data (IPD) from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA) described correlation coefficients examining (i) direct comparisons of assessments from pain-specific and multidomain assessment tools that included pain, (ii) indirect comparisons of pain assessments with the Barthel Index (BI) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and (iii) whether pain identification could be enhanced by accounting for reported usual activities, self-care, mobility and anxiety/depression; factors associated with pain. Results: European Quality of Life 3- and 5-Level (EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L), RAND 36 Item Health Survey 1.0 (SF-36) or the 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) were available from 10/94 studies (IPD = 10,002). The 0-10 NPRS was the only available pain-specific assessment tool and was a reference for comparison with other tools. Pearson correlation coefficients between the 0-10 NPRS and (A) the EQ-5D-3L and (B) EQ5D-5 L were Discussion: The EQ-5D-3L pain domain aligned better than the EQ-5D-5L with the 0-10 NPRS and may inform general pain description where resources and assessment burden hinder use of additional, pain-specific assessments.

Indexed as

assessmentassessment optimisationEQ-5DEQ-5D-3LEQ-5D-5LNPRS strokepainstroke

Identifiers

PMID38333610
PMCPMC10851776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.