ArticleSocial psychological and personality science2023
Decomposing variance in co-rumination using dyadic daily diary data.
Article in Social psychological and personality science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Distress dynamics in patient and partner dyads early after stroke/transient ischemic attack: A pilot feasibility study.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2026Observational
- Daily loneliness deconstructed: Examining patterns of within- and between-person variation.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Working through emotions: Sadness predicts social engagement and physiologic linkage for men and disengagement for women in dyadic interactions.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- The association of Big-Five personality with co-rumination and its trade-off effect in Chinese adolescents: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Emphasizing theAffective science · 2024Review
- The associations of COVID-19 percent positivity rate, relationship quality, and season with daily anxiety and depression in couples living in NYC.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It is unknown how co-rumination, or perseverating on problems or feelings
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.