Article in PhytoKeys, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Xiangui YiCo-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of life sciences, Cerasus Research Center, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3123-9076
Jingjing DongCo-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of life sciences, Cerasus Research Center, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5269-4778
Jie ChenCo-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of life sciences, Cerasus Research Center, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.
Huajin ZhouCo-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of life sciences, Cerasus Research Center, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.
Tong WuCo-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of life sciences, Cerasus Research Center, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.
Shucheng GaoCo-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of life sciences, Cerasus Research Center, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.
Xiangzhen ChenCo-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of life sciences, Cerasus Research Center, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.
Meng LiCo-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of life sciences, Cerasus Research Center, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2085-3388
Xianrong WangCo-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of life sciences, Cerasus Research Center, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, Jiangsu, China Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7940-909X
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Molecular and morphological evidence support a new species of Rosaceae · full record | OpenQuestion