ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2024
Accessibility of malaria commodities in Geita District Council, mainland Tanzania: the experiences from healthcare providers and clients.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Access to essential malaria commodities is a cornerstone in malaria control. However optimal availability and access to essential malaria commodities remain a challenge in Tanzania. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the factors affecting the accessibility of malaria commodities in Tanzania. Methods: This was a mixed-method cross-sectional study using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Data were collected between February and March 2023 from health facilities, health facility staff, and patients. Results: Availability of malaria commodities in government health facilities was 100% for all items while in the private and faith-based facilities, this ranged from 10% to 80%. The reasons for stockouts in Government facilities were related to delayed and inadequate quantity delivery while in private facilities the main reason was the lack of cash for procurement. Both private facilities' clients and healthcare providers concurred that most people do not access complete treatment due to the high costs of prescribed medicines and poor stocking levels. Conclusion: The availability, hence the accessibility, of malaria commodities in private and faith-based health facilities is still sub-optimal. Logistic management needs to be improved to eliminate stockouts and malaria commodities high costs need a permanent solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.