Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333555›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2024

Genetic parameters and genomic prediction of growth and breast morphological traits in a crossbreed duck population.

Wentao Cai, Jian Hu, Wenlei Fan, Yaxi Xu, Jing Tang, Ming Xie, Yunsheng Zhang, Zhanbao Guo, Zhengkui Zhou, Shuisheng Hou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wentao CaiInstitute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5639-1755
Jian HuInstitute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Wenlei FanInstitute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Yaxi XuCollege of Animal Science and Technology Beijing University of Agriculture Beijing China.
Jing TangInstitute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Ming XieInstitute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Yunsheng ZhangInstitute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Zhanbao GuoInstitute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Zhengkui ZhouInstitute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.
Shuisheng HouInstitute of Animal Science Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8016-8863
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNBeijing University of Agriculture · CNQingdao Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has great potential to increase genetic gain in poultry breeding. However, the performance of genomic prediction in duck growth and breast morphological (BM) traits remains largely unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the benefits of genomic prediction for duck growth and BM traits using methods such as GBLUP, single-step GBLUP, Bayesian models, and different marker densities. This study collected phenotypic data for 14 growth and BM traits in a crossbreed population of 1893 Pekin duck × mallard, which included 941 genotyped ducks. The estimation of genetic parameters indicated high heritabilities for body weight (0.54-0.72), whereas moderate-to-high heritabilities for average daily gain (0.21-0.57) traits. The heritabilities of BM traits ranged from low to moderate (0.18-0.39). The prediction ability of GS on growth and BM traits increased by 7.6% on average compared to the pedigree-based BLUP method. The single-step GBLUP outperformed GBLUP in most traits with an average of 0.3% higher reliability in our study. Most of the Bayesian models had better performance on predictive reliability, except for BayesR. BayesN emerged as the top-performing model for genomic prediction of both growth and BM traits, exhibiting an average increase in reliability of 3.0% compared to GBLUP. The permutation studies revealed that 50 K markers had achieved ideal prediction reliability, while 3 K markers still achieved 90.8% predictive capability would further reduce the cost for duck growth and BM traits. This study provides promising evidence for the application of GS in improving duck growth and BM traits. Our findings offer some useful strategies for optimizing the predictive ability of GS in growth and BM traits and provide theoretical foundations for designing a low-density panel in ducks.

Indexed as

Bayesian modelsgenetic correlationgenomic selectionheritabilitysingle‐step

Identifiers

PMID38333555
PMCPMC10848588
OpenAlexW4391602606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.