Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333542›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) clinical practice guidance for the prevention of breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema (BCRAL): international Delphi consensus-based recommendations.

Henry C Y Wong, Matthew P Wallen, Adrian Wai Chan, Narayanee Dick, Pierluigi Bonomo, Monique Bareham, Julie Ryan Wolf, Corina van den Hurk, Margaret Fitch, Edward Chow and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Synthesis of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations for breast cancer survivorship care: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Based on the health belief model: a qualitative exploration of factors influencing early screening behavior for breast cancer-related lymphedema.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Structural equation modeling of factors influencing preventive intention for postoperative breast cancer-related lymphedema: based on health action process approach.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. The Canadian Breast Cancer Symposium 2025: Meeting Report.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Advancing Lymphedema Surveillance With Evidence-Based Practices.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Henry C Y WongDepartment of Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Hong Kong S.A.R, China.
Matthew P WallenCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Adrian Wai ChanDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong S.A.R, China.
Narayanee DickCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Pierluigi BonomoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Italy.
Monique BarehamFlinders Health Medical Research Consumer Advisory Board, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia.
Julie Ryan WolfDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester, New York, USA.
Corina van den HurkR&D Department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, Netherlands.
Margaret FitchLawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Edward ChowDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Raymond J ChanCaring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
MASCC BCRAL Expert Panel and the Oncodermatology and Survivorship Study Groups
Flinders University · AUAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity of Toronto · CANetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLTuen Mun Hospital · CNUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Developing strategies to prevent breast cancer-related arm lymphoedema (BCRAL) is a critical unmet need because there are no effective interventions to eradicate it once it reaches a chronic state. Certain strategies such as prospective surveillance programs and prophylactic lymphatic reconstruction have been reported to be effective in clinical trials. However, a large variation exists in practice based on clinician preference, organizational standards, and local resources. Methods: A two-round international Delphi consensus process was performed from February 27, 2023 to May 25, 2023 to compile opinions of 55 experts involved in the care and research of breast cancer and lymphoedema on such interventions. Findings: Axillary lymph node dissection, use of post-operative radiotherapy, relative within-arm volume increase one month after surgery, greater number of lymph nodes dissected, and high body mass index were recommended as the most important risk factors to guide selection of patients for interventions to prevent BCRAL. The panel recommended that prospective surveillance programs should be implemented to screen for and reduce risks of BCRAL where feasible and resources allow. Prophylactic compression sleeves, axillary reverse mapping and prophylactic lymphatic reconstruction should be offered for patients who are at risk for developing BCRAL as options where expertise is available and resources allow. Recommendations on axillary management in clinical T1-2, node negative breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes were also provided by the expert panel. Routine axillary lymph node dissection should not be offered in these patients who receive breast conservation therapy. Axillary radiation instead of axillary lymph node dissection should be considered in the same group of patients undergoing mastectomy. Interpretation: An individualised approach based on patients' preferences, risk factors for BCRAL, availability of treatment options and expertise of the healthcare team is paramount to ensure patients at risk receive preventive interventions for BCRAL, regardless of where they are receiving care. Funding: This study was not supported by any funding. RJC received investigator grant support from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1194051).

Indexed as

Breast cancer related arm lymphoedemaDelphi consensusPrevention

Identifiers

PMID38333542
PMCPMC10850412
OpenAlexW4391481140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.