ArticleCureus2024
Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life in Adolescents With Obesity: A Randomized Qualitative Study Among Healthcare Professionals.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Letter to the editor on "Bariatric intervention improves metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis in patients with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis".Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescent obesity constitutes a disorder with physical and psychosocial implications. Childhood and adolescent obesity rates are constantly increasing worldwide. Since adolescent obesity is a chronic disease, which is part of noncommunicative degenerative diseases, its holistic approach decisively includes the assessment of its impact on quality of life. The use of the tools Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory 4.0 (PedsQL4.0) and The Impact of Weight on Quality of Life for Kids (IWQOL-Kids), the familiarity of health professionals with them, their applicability, and relevance in clinical practice, are a cornerstone in the promotion of health services in adolescent obesity. The present randomized qualitative study aimed to highlight the attitudes and preferences of pediatricians on the assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), among obese adolescents. The sample consists of 120 pediatricians, randomly selected from the totality of municipality-registered pediatricians (Municipality of Thessaloniki, Greece) who were interviewed in a semi-structured way, regarding their attitudes in the assessment of health-related quality of life, as measured by the PedsQL4.0 and IWQOL-Kids tools. The interviews revealed that most participants gained insight into the HRQoL assessment process during the present study interview with the researchers. Only eight (n=8/120) participants were familiar with the explored tools, PedsQL4.0 and IWQOL-KIDS. The remaining sample (n=112/120) was unfamiliar with both the two questionnaires and their content as well. Among the referred barriers to the usage of the tools, lack of time was stated as the pivotal factor hindering the implementation of the tools in clinical practice. There was no consensus on the preferred questionnaire among the participating healthcare professionals. All participants stated that the use of one or both questionnaires would have added significant value to the support and care of adolescents with obesity. Tools assessing HRQoL present low familiarity among pediatricians in real-world data. Focus on the engagement of the healthcare providers in the evaluation of obesity-related quality of life is unequivocal, in order to improve health care status in adolescents with obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.