ArticleCureus2024
Study of the Vertical Transmission of COVID-19 by Using the World Health Organisation Protocol in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Eastern India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe World Health Organisation (WHO) has established criteria to diagnose vertical transmission in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This study aimed to determine the incidence of vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 using WHO criteria in a tertiary care centre in eastern India.
methodsA hospital-based prospective observational study was conducted from June 2021 to February 2022 on women admitted for delivery with a positive nasopharyngeal (NP) swab and a SARS-CoV-2 real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test. Following the delivery, the amniotic fluid (AF) and swab from the placenta were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by the Truenat test. The umbilical cord and maternal blood were analyzed to detect immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG). The nasopharyngeal swabs of the newborns were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR.
resultsForty-eight SARS-CoV-2-positive asymptomatic women were included in the study. Twenty-eight (58.3%) were delivered via cesarean section. Preterm delivery occurred in 13 (27.1%) cases. In only one case, vertical transmission was confirmed as the neonate had a positive nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test and the cord blood was IgM positive (suggesting an immune response in the neonate). The placenta was positive in three cases, and amniotic fluid was positive in two. However, vertical transmission was deemed unlikely in these cases as there was no evidence of immune response or viral persistence according to the WHO criteria. There was one stillbirth, and it tested negative for SARS-CoV-2.
conclusionThis study strengthens the evidence of vertical transmission in COVID-19-positive asymptomatic mothers. The data suggest a low transmission rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.