ReviewCureus2024
Comparison of Dosage of Glucocorticoid in Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIdiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) with moderate risk or above was recommended to receive immunosuppressive therapy. We attempted to evaluate the optimal dose of glucocorticoid when combined with evidence-proven effective immunosuppressants by network meta-analysis.
methodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception until January 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in IMN limited to supportive care, glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), and rituximab were screened.
resultsTwenty-eight RCTs of 1,830 patients were included. Therapeutic regimens were divided as follows: moderate- to high-dose glucocorticoids plus CNIs (HMSCn), moderate- to high-dose glucocorticoids plus cyclophosphamide (HMSCt), moderate- to high-dose glucocorticoids plus chlorambucil (HMSCh), zero- to low-dose glucocorticoids plus CNIs (LNSCn), zero- to low-dose glucocorticoids plus cyclophosphamide (LNSCt), rituximab alone (R), glucocorticoids alone (SE), and supportive care alone (SP). Compared with SP, HMSCh (risk ratio [RR]: 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1, 3.18), HMSCn (RR: 2.5, 95%CI: 1.25, 5.11), HMSCt (RR: 2.15, 95%CI: 1.29, 3.64), LNSCn (RR: 2.16, 95%CI: 1.25, 3.95), and R (RR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1, 4.39) had a higher probability of total remission rate, while HMSCn represented the highest probability depending on the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) ranking values. Regarding infection, no significant difference was found between different doses of glucocorticoids plus the same immunosuppressant. HMSCn and HMSCt showed superiority in reducing 24-hour urine total protein compared with HMSCh, LNSCn, SE, and SP, while HMSCn seemed to be the most effective regimen through the ranking of SUCRA value.
conclusionModerate- to high-dose glucocorticoids showed superiority in proteinuria remission when combined with CNIs in IMN, with no increasing risk of infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.