Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333375›Full record

ArticleJournal of arrhythmia2024

Evaluation and comparison of impedance and amplitude changes in lesion index-guided pulmonary vein isolation.

Yutaro Kaneko, Yoshihisa Naruse, Taro Narumi, Makoto Sano, Tsuyoshi Urushida, Yuichiro Maekawa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of arrhythmia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yutaro KanekoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine III Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7790-4200
Yoshihisa NaruseDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine III Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9630-951X
Taro NarumiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine III Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.
Makoto SanoDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine III Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4638-3257
Tsuyoshi UrushidaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine III Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.
Yuichiro MaekawaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine III Hamamatsu University School of Medicine Hamamatsu Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The lesion index (LSI) has been used to estimate lesion formation after radiofrequency catheter ablation. However, the impedance drop and decrease in bipolar amplitude of intracardiac electrograms, which are parameters that are traditionally used to predict effective ablation lesions, are not used to calculate LSI. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between LSI and traditional parameters. Methods: We retrospectively investigated 1355 ablation points from 31 patients who underwent LSI-guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using TactiCath. All points were classified into 3 groups based on the impedance drop: (i) <10 Ω ( Results: The target LSI was achieved at 1177 points (86.9%). The median total impedance drop and amplitude just after ablation were 16.0 [13.0-20.0] Ω and 0.21 [0.14-0.30] mV, respectively. There were significant differences among the 3 groups in the impedance and amplitude before ablation, power, target LSI, final LSI, contact force, and interlesion distance. An impedance drop of >10 Ω or an amplitude reduction of >50% was achieved at 95% and 82% of the study points, respectively. There were no major complications at any of the ablation points. Conclusion: LSI-guided PVI seemed to be useful for making sufficient ablation lesions, as assessed by the conventional parameters of impedance and amplitude change.

Indexed as

ablationatrial fibrillationimpedance droplesion indexpulmonary vein isolation

Identifiers

PMID38333375
PMCPMC10848590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.