ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Hidden blood loss in three different endoscopic spinal procedures for lumbar disc herniation.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression for single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Pooled it
- Modifiable risk factors for perioperative hidden blood loss in unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Pooled it
- Hidden Blood Loss in Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression Compared with Biportal Endoscopic and Open Microscopic Surgery for Single-Segment Lumbar Stenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Unilateral biportal endoscopy for upper lumbar disc herniation: surgical challenges and clinical outcomes.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic technique for adjacent segment pathology following lumbar fusion.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Comparison of Hidden Blood Loss in Biportal Endoscopic Spine Surgery and Open Surgery in the Lumbar Spine: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Risk factors for perioperative complications following unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025Article
- Hidden blood loss in percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via the posterolateral approach.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of surgical invasiveness and hidden blood loss between unilateral double portal endoscopic lumbar disc extraction and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Comparison of clinical outcomes and cost-utility between unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for single-level lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective matched controlled study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study compared hidden blood loss (HBL) among three different endoscopic spinal procedures and investigated its risk factors. Patients and methods: This single-centre retrospective analysis collected data from consecutive hospitalized patients with single-segment lumbar disc herniation (LDH) undergoing unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy (UBE), percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD), or percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) from December 2020 to October 2022. HBL was calculated using Nadler's and Gross's formulas. The authors used Pearson's or Spearman's correlation analysis to explore the relationship between patient characteristics and HBL. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for HBL. Results: In total, 122 consecutive patients (68 females and 54 males) were enroled in this study. The average HBL was 381.87±218.01 ml in the UBE group, 252.05±118.44 ml in the PETD group and 229.63±143.9 ml in the PEID group ( Conclusion: HBL was higher in the UBE group than in the PETD and PEID groups, and operative time may be a common risk factor for the three groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.