ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Suspected NUT carcinoma progressing on pembrolizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel as first-line treatment: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-angiogenic therapy as a beacon of hope in the battle against pulmonary NUT midline carcinoma.Frontiers of medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Immune biomarker landscape and fusion partner-phenotype associations in thoracic and head-and-neck NUT carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Nationwide retrospective study on the prevalence and prognostic factors of NUT carcinoma in the United States.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- [Research Progress on Pathogenesis and Treatment of NUT Carcinoma].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: NUT carcinoma of the thorax is an extremely rare neoplasm characterized by a translocation between the NUT M1 gene and members of the bromodomain genetic family. Due to the rarity of the neoplasm, standardized treatment guidelines have not yet been established. Several chemotherapeutic agents have been used with limited success, due to the rapid development of resistance to treatment. Pembrolizumab, an anti-programmed-death-1 antibody, has become increasingly used in non-small-cell lung carcinomas. Consequently, pembrolizumab may be beneficial in the treatment of NUT carcinoma. Case presentation: In this article, we discuss the case of a 24-year-old man who was referred to our centre due to an incidental mass finding on an unrelated computed tomography scan. Morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics are highly suspicious of NUT carcinoma with bone metastasis. The patient was placed on carboplatin, paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab as first-line therapy. The patient later progressed and began receiving second-line treatment according to Ewing's protocol. 20 months later, the mass continued to grow, and the patient was started on docetaxel and gemcitabine, which was unsuccessful. After discussing with the patient, he decided to stop chemotherapy and begin palliative care. Clinical discussion: NUT carcinoma is an aggressive tumour with poor prognosis. Treatment options are limited and pembrolizumab does not seem to influence the clinical outcome of the neoplasm. Conclusion: Overall, pembrolizumab does not seem to improve the outcomes of NUT carcinoma patients. To the authors' knowledge, this is the second article reporting the effects of pembrolizumab on the progression of NUT carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.