ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Usefulness of the hybrid technique of interventional radiology and endoscopic treatment for intestinal bleeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: In endovascular treatment of ruptured pseudoaneurysm after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with gastrointestinal bleeding, treatment for vasospasm of the culprit vessel from haemorrhagic shock and subsequent reperfusion has not been determined before. Case presentation: The authors hereby present you with a case of a 59-year-old man with unknown operative method upon arrival at the Emergecy room and who had hematemesis and collapse 6 months post-PD surgery. Clinical discussion: An initial contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed no obvious source of bleeding, so an upper gastrointestinal endoscope was performed. Rebleeding occurred during the examination, and interventional radiology was performed because haemostasis was difficult. Coil embolization was performed for leakage of contrast material from the gastroduodenal artery stump into the gastrointestinal tract. However, because the embolization was uncertain due to vasospasm of the common hepatic artery, endoscopic clipping of the perforation site was also performed to prevent rebleeding due to reperfusion after improvement of vasospasm. A CT scan 5 days later showed reperfusion of the coil-implanted vessel. No rebleeding or hepatic infarction occurred postoperatively. Conclusion: In this case, the haemostasis by coil embolization was uncertain due to the presence of vasospasm, and clipping was used in combination with the procedure to prevent rebleeding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.