ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Successful pregnancy after cyclophosphamide therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Spray-dried cyclophosphamide-loaded polyhydroxyalkanoate microparticles: design and characterization.ADMET & DMPK · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: The use of cyclophosphamide in women of childbearing age with severe systemic lupus erythematosus is normally indicated. However, cyclophosphamide is generally avoided during pregnancy due to the risk of teratogenicity, especially since its effect on fetal survival is poorly understood. This is a case report of a lupus patient exposed to cyclophosphamide during pregnancy. Case presentation: A 35-year-old woman with a history of lupus presented to our outpatient clinic in the 12th week of pregnancy for her sixth routine cyclophosphamide bolus. The fetal echocardiogram result with the gynecology consultation was normal with the recommendation for a medical termination of pregnancy, which has been refused by the patient. Shared decision-making with the patient included a discussion of the maternal risks of continuation of pregnancy in the setting of worsening systemic function and the fetal risks of definitive treatment with cyclophosphamide for a lupus flare and the patient decided to proceed with the pregnancy. Treatment with immunosuppressants, including azathioprine was initiated replacing cyclophosphamide with close monitoring of her and the fetus every month. Clinical discussion: The first trimester of pregnancy seems to be particularly susceptible to fetal malformations, although CPA effects on fetuses in later stages of pregnancy are also reported occasionally. Nonetheless, its repercussions on fetal survival remain poorly comprehended. Conclusion: In conclusion, exposing pregnancy to cyclophosphamide could end with pregnancy loss. Based on our experience, the survival of the fetus is strongly in doubt when cyclophosphamide is required to treat lupus in the mother. However, in rare cases, it could be without complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.