Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333229›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in infectious disease

Cerebrospinal fluid shunting for the management of cryptococcal meningitis: a scoping review.

Gonzalo Cornejo-Venegas, Xosse Carreras, Andrea S Salcedo, David R Soriano-Moreno, Jorge L Salinas, Jorge Alave

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in infectious disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Chronic meningitis: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gonzalo Cornejo-VenegasEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8402-010X
Xosse CarrerasEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.
Andrea S SalcedoEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.
David R Soriano-MorenoUnidad de Investigación Clínica y Epidemiológica, Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Peru.
Jorge L SalinasDivision of Infectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, CA, USA.
Jorge AlaveEscuela de Medicina, Universidad Peruana Unión, Carretera Central Km 19.5 Ñaña, Chosica, Lima 15464, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1178-2445
Peruvian University of Applied Sciences · PEUniversidad Peruana Unión · PEStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review aimed to describe studies that evaluate the management of cryptococcal meningitis (CM) using cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts, types of shunts used, and clinically relevant patient outcomes. Methods: We searched in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science/Core collection, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov on 1 April 2022. We included two-arm and one-arm cohort studies that evaluated clinically relevant patient outcomes. Case reports were used to describe the type of CSF shunts used and the rationale behind its selection. The selection and extraction processes were independently performed by two authors. Results: This study included 20 cohort studies and 26 case reports. Only seven cohort studies compared two groups. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt was the most commonly used type of shunt (82.1%). The main indications for placing a shunt were persistently high opening pressure (57.1%) and persisting neurological symptoms or deterioration (54.3%). Cohort studies suggest that patients with shunt showed improvement in some outcomes such as neurological symptoms and hospital stay length. The most common shunt complications were post-operative fever (1-35.6%) and shunt obstruction (7-16%). Conclusion: CSF shunts may improve some clinically relevant outcomes in patients with CM, but the evidence is very uncertain.

Indexed as

cerebrospinal fluid shuntscryptococcalintracranial hypertensionmeningitis

Identifiers

PMID38333229
PMCPMC10851763
OpenAlexW4391635607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.