ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2023
Policy analysis of cervical cancer prevention in Iran based on the policy triangle model.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Public policy on Human Papillomavirus immunization: an analysis based on the Walt and Gilson policy triangle.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWidespread use of screening in high-income countries has led to a significant reduction in cervical cancer mortality. Most low- and middle-income countries still have poorly organized screening programs. This study aimed at policy analysis of prevention and early detection of cervical cancer in Iran, a middle-income country. MATERIALS AND
methodThis qualitative retrospective study, extended by the health policy triangle model, was conducted from July 2020 to September 2021. A sample of this study consisted of 43 participants, including 16 key policy experts; nine 11 senior health system managers, 13 executives, and 3 clients selected purposefully. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews using the interview guide and analyzed using a framework analysis method based on the policy triangle model in MAXQDA
resultsNine themes, 15 subthemes, and 36 codes were extracted based on the 4 dimensions of the model; stakeholder analysis challenges, including conflict of interest and decision-making challenges. Moreover, the most important policy process challenges indicated the weakness of monitoring and evaluation systems and weakness of using scientific principles in policy making. Weakness of organizational and intersectoral structure and weakness of executive management were obtained among the challenges in the context analysis. Finally, the most important challenges related to content analysis are weaknesses in applying scientific principles in policy making, including weaknesses in standard operating procedures, and low use of HTA capacity in developed guidelines.
conclusionA wide range of economic, social, and cultural problems can affect cervical cancer prevention policies. Several strategies are suggested to overcome these challenges, including allocating separate funds to cancer prevention programs, using structures to sustain prevention programs, designing, and using them to improve public awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.