Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333150›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2023

Innovative AETCOM session on health care as a right: Experience at the medical college in Puducherry.

Chandar Sahanaa, Rajasekar Niranjan, Kumar Pradeep, Samundeswari Gopinath, Elanchezhian Dhanasekar, Sengadhir Vendhan, Vasanthakogilam Maniradjou, Rajesh Kumar Konduru, Manjiri Phalsalkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Chandar SahanaaDepartment of Community Medicine, Pondicherry Institute of Medial Sciences, Ganapathichettikulam, Kalapet, Pondicherry, India.
Rajasekar NiranjanDepartment of Community Medicine, Pondicherry Institute of Medial Sciences, Ganapathichettikulam, Kalapet, Pondicherry, India.
Kumar PradeepDepartment of Community Medicine, Pondicherry Institute of Medial Sciences, Ganapathichettikulam, Kalapet, Pondicherry, India.
Samundeswari GopinathDepartment of Community Medicine, Pondicherry Institute of Medial Sciences, Ganapathichettikulam, Kalapet, Pondicherry, India.
Elanchezhian DhanasekarDepartment of Community Medicine, Pondicherry Institute of Medial Sciences, Ganapathichettikulam, Kalapet, Pondicherry, India.
Sengadhir VendhanDepartment of Community Medicine, Pondicherry Institute of Medial Sciences, Ganapathichettikulam, Kalapet, Pondicherry, India.
Vasanthakogilam ManiradjouDepartment of Community Medicine, Pondicherry Institute of Medial Sciences, Ganapathichettikulam, Kalapet, Pondicherry, India.
Rajesh Kumar KonduruDepartment of Community Medicine, Pondicherry Institute of Medial Sciences, Ganapathichettikulam, Kalapet, Pondicherry, India.
Manjiri PhalsalkarDepartment of Pathology, Pondicherry Institute of Medial Sciences, Ganapathichettikulam, Kalapet, Pondicherry, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttitude, Ethics, and Communication (AETCOM) module 2.3 is effective in improving the communication skills of medical students, which in turn will prevent malpractices and litigations against doctors. Module 2.3, 'Health Care as a Right,' was aimed at introducing healthcare systems, access, equity in access, the impact of socio-economic situation in determining healthcare access, the role of doctors as key players, and the missing links in the health care systems to students. MATERIALS AND

methodsA teaching and learning activity was developed for MBBS professional year 2 on AETCOM 2.3. The activities planned were an introduction to the topic, a short documentary film using AV aids, role play by the team, group discussion followed by role play by the students, reflective writing, and finally summarizing the session with a take-home message.

resultsThe number of responses received in reflective writing was 114. The thematic analysis of qualitative responses was grouped into categories The facilitating factors were the availability of trained doctors and round-the-clock services, and the hindering factors were disrespect to patients, professional misconduct, long waiting time, etc. The suggestions to improve communication between the doctor and the patient were to listen politely and develop good rapport. The qualities of a good doctor were good communication skills, empathy, professional conduct, etc.

conclusionThis AETCOM session helped the students understand the healthcare delivery system in the country. It changed their attitude toward patients and improved their communication skills as they were soon-to-become doctors.

Indexed as

AETCOMdoctor-patient relationhealth care as a rightinnovative teaching

Identifiers

PMID38333150
PMCPMC10852154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.