ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024
Plasma ddPCR for the detection of
Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The progress of biomarkers detection to lung cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- New Candidate Reference Measurement Procedures for MET CNV Detection and Quantification Using Digital PCR.Biological procedures online · 2026Article
- Review
- MET Alterations in Cancer and MET-Targeted Therapy: Detection Strategies, Treatment Efficacy, and Emerging Technologies.Targeted oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mesenchymal-epithelial transition ( Objective: This study assessed the performance of plasma droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in Design and methods: A total of 87 NSCLC patients were enrolled, and 94 paired tissue and plasma samples were analyzed for the concordance between FISH and plasma ddPCR/tissue next-generation sequencing (NGS) in detecting Results: Plasma ddPCR showed substantial concordance with FISH (74.1% sensitivity, 92.5% specificity, and 87.2% accuracy with a kappa value of 0.68) and outperformed tissue NGS (kappa value of 0.64) in Conclusion: Plasma ddPCR is a potentially reliable method for detecting
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.