Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333072›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in urology

Oncological outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the value of PSA density as a preoperative predictive factor.

Roser Vives Dilme, Juan Gómez Rivas, Laura Fernández Hernández, Irene De la Parra Sánchez, Rafael Sánchez Del Hoyo, María Isabel Galante Romo, Enrique Redondo González, José Luis Senovilla Pérez, Lorena Fernández Montarroso, Jesús Moreno Sierra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in urology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A machine learning model incorporatingQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Roser Vives DilmeDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, C/ Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, Madrid 28040, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2149-5375
Juan Gómez RivasDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Laura Fernández HernándezDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Irene De la Parra SánchezDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael Sánchez Del HoyoInstitute for Health Research "Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos" (IdISSC), Madrid, Spain.
María Isabel Galante RomoDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Enrique Redondo GonzálezDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
José Luis Senovilla PérezDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Lorena Fernández MontarrosoDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús Moreno SierraDepartment of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pretreatment assessment of patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) is essential for therapeutic decision-making. Currently available staging systems based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, and clinical stage allow for determining the prognostic characteristics of these patients. Several studies have evaluated the preoperative use of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) as a prognostic factor for further risk stratification. To date, the role of PSAD in this setting is still an object of debate. Objectives: The present analysis aimed to assess the predictive potential of PSAD for adverse oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and to compare its accuracy to preoperative PSA (pPSA). Design and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 427 patients diagnosed with localized PCa who underwent RARP at a single institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Generating receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves, calculating areas under the curves (AUCs), and using a linear regression model, we analyzed the association of PSAD and pPSA with postoperative positive surgical margins (PSM), Gleason score ⩾ 7, persistent PSA, and biochemical recurrence (BCR), with a median follow-up of 47 months. Results: PSAD showed a significant association with PSM ( Conclusion: PSAD is a predictive factor for postoperative oncological outcomes of PSM, Gleason score ⩾ 7, and persistence of PSA. Despite the need for further studies, PSAD could be useful as a prognostic parameter in conjunction with established staging systems.

Indexed as

oncological outcomesprostate cancerprostate-specific antigenprostate-specific antigen densityrobot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID38333072
PMCPMC10851720
OpenAlexW4391635215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.