ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
In Vitro Characterization of Fat Grafts Processed Using the REVOLVE ENVI System versus Decantation.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Fluidic Platform for Washing and Mechanical Processing of Lipoaspirate for Downstream Fat Grafting and Regenerative Applications.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Preclinical Volume Retention of Fat Grafts Processed with REVOLVE™ Technology or Decantation Methods in Irradiated and Nonirradiated Wounds.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This preclinical study evaluated benchtop/in vitro properties and fat viability and activity of grafts processed using the REVOLVE ENVI 600 system compared with decantation and evaluated properties of REVOLVE ENVI waste. Methods: Lipoaspirate from six donors was processed using REVOLVE ENVI or decantation. The composition of each graft, hematocrit/red blood cell content, fat particle size/macrostructure, viable adipocyte count, and adipocyte activity were analyzed. Stromal vascular fraction was analyzed for viable progenitor cell count and colony-forming units. Results: REVOLVE ENVI grafts had a higher mean (±SD) fat content at 85.6% ± 6.1% than decanted grafts at 72.1% ± 4.0% ( Conclusion: Fat grafts processed using REVOLVE ENVI demonstrated greater viability and activity than decanted grafts in vitro.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.