Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38333020›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of general medicine2024

Carrageenan-Containing Nasal Spray Alleviates Allergic Symptoms in Participants with Grass Pollen Allergy: A Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Clinical Trial.

Nicole Unger-Manhart, Martina Morokutti-Kurz, Petra U Zieglmayer, Patrick Lemell, Markus Savli, René Zieglmayer, Eva Prieschl-Grassauer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase ReportsClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of general medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04531358 (Demonstration of an Anti-allergic Effect in Subjects Treated With Callergin Nasal Spray in Comparison to Untreated Subjects and Subjects Treated With Vis Alpin® Alpensalz Nasal Spray, All Suffering From Grass Pollen Induced Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04531358 nacompletednot on this map

Demonstration of an Anti-allergic Effect in Subjects Treated With Callergin Nasal Spray in Comparison to Untreated Subjects and Subjects Treated With Vis Alpin® Alpensalz Nasal Spray, All Suffering From Grass Pollen Induced Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMarinomed Biotech AGRan2020 to 2020Enrolled42ConditionsAllergic Rhinitis, Allergic RhinoconjunctivitisArmsnasal spray, no treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole Unger-Manhart *Marinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.
Martina Morokutti-Kurz *Marinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.
Petra U ZieglmayerVienna Challenge Chamber, Vienna, Austria.
Patrick LemellVienna Challenge Chamber, Vienna, Austria.
Markus SavliBiostatistik & Consulting GmbH, Zurich, Switzerland.
René ZieglmayerVienna Challenge Chamber, Vienna, Austria.
Eva Prieschl-GrassauerMarinomed Biotech AG, Korneuburg, Austria.
Marinomed Biotech (Austria) · ATVienna Challenge Chamber · ATKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Nonpharmacological, barrier-forming nasal sprays are used to manage symptoms of allergic rhinitis. We aim to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Callergin (investigational product, IP), a nasal spray containing barrier-forming iota-carrageenan, in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods: In this randomized, controlled, crossover trial, adults with grass pollen allergy underwent a treatment sequence with IP, VisAlpin (comparator product, CP), and no treatment in random order. Treatment blocks consisted in prophylactic administration of the assigned treatment or no treatment, followed by a 3-hr allergen exposure, and were separated by a washout period of 7 days. Primary endpoint was a mean change from baseline in "Total Nasal Symptom Score" (TNSS, sum of rhinorrhea, itching, sneezing, and congestion scores) over 3 hr, recorded every 15 min during the challenge period. Results: A total of 42 participants underwent randomization. Exposure to grass pollen for 3 hr induced a notable TNSS increase from baseline in all participants at all times. Mean TNSS change from baseline over 3 hr was lower when participants received IP compared to no treatment, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (untreated 6.96 ± 2.30; IP 6.59 ± 1.93; difference 0.37 points [95% CI (confidence interval) -0.17 to 0.91]; p=0.170). In a post-hoc analysis, mean TNSS at 3 hr was significantly reduced after IP treatment compared to no treatment (untreated 8.29 ± 2.64; IP 7.70 ± 2.56; difference 0.60 points [95% CI -0.10 to 1.29] p=0.028). While all individual nasal symptoms contributed to this effect, rhinorrhea (p=0.013) and congestion (p=0.076) contributed most. Consistently, nasal secretion weight was slightly reduced with IP treatment (p=0.119). IP was safe and well-tolerated, with similar incidence of adverse events across treatment groups. Conclusion: Prophylactic treatment with the iota-carrageenan nasal spray IP is safe, well-tolerated, and alleviates nasal allergy symptoms in adults with grass pollen-induced AR. Trial Registration: NCT04531358.

Indexed as

allergic rhinitisbarrierdrug-freeiota-carrageenannonpharmacological

Identifiers

PMID38333020
PMCPMC10850985
OpenAlexW4391511423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.