Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38332977›Full record

ArticlePaediatrics & child health2024

Identifying child maltreatment during virtual medical appointments through the COVID-19 pandemic: A physician-based survey.

Stephanie Lim-Reinders, Michelle G K Ward, Claudia Malic, Kathryn Keely, Kristopher Kang, Nita Jain, Kelley Zwicker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Paediatrics & child health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie Lim-ReindersDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4183-9975
Michelle G K WardDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Claudia MalicDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Paediatric Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Kathryn KeelyDivision of Community Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Kristopher KangDivision of General Paediatrics, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5144-3800
Nita JainChild Protection Service Unit, Department of Paediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Kelley ZwickerDivision of Community Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic there has been a documented decline in reports to child protective services, despite an increased incidence of child maltreatment. This is concerning for increasing missed cases. This study aims to examine if and how Canadian paediatricians are identifying maltreatment in virtual medical appointments. Methods: A survey was sent through the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program (CPSP) to 2770 practicing general and subspecialty paediatricians. Data was collected November 2021 to January 2022. Results: With a 34% (928/2770) response rate, 704 surveys were eligible for analysis. At least one case of child maltreatment was reported by 11% (78/700) of respondents following a virtual appointment. The number of cases reported was associated with years in medical practice (P = 0.026) but not with the volume (P = 0.735) or prior experience (P = 0.127) with virtual care, or perceived difficulty in identifying cases virtually (Cramer's V = 0.096). The most common factors triggering concern were the presence of social stressors, or a clear disclosure. The virtual physical exam was not contributory. Nearly one quarter (24%, 34/143) required a subsequent in-person appointment prior to reporting the case and 32% (207/648) reported concerns that a case had been identified late, or missed, following a virtual appointment. Some commented that clear harm resulted. Conclusions: Many barriers to detecting child maltreatment were identified by paediatricians who used virtual care. This survey reveals that virtual care may be an important factor in missed cases of child maltreatment and may present challenges to timely identification.

Indexed as

Child maltreatmentCOVID-19Virtual care

Identifiers

PMID38332977
PMCPMC10848113
OpenAlexW4387116634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.