Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38332899›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2024

Exploring synthesis and applications of green nanoparticles and the role of nanotechnology in wastewater treatment.

Shreya Rathod, Subham Preetam, Chetan Pandey, Sweta Parimita Bera

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Synthesis and evaluation of Cd-CoFrontiers in chemistry · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shreya RathodSchool of Sciences, P P Savani University, Surat, Gujarat, 391425, India.
Subham PreetamInstitute of Advanced Materials, IAAM, Gammalkilsvägen 18, Ulrika, 59053, Sweden.
Chetan PandeyDepartment of Botany, Hindu College, University of Delhi, New Delhi, 110007, India.
Sweta Parimita BeraSchool of Sciences, P P Savani University, Surat, Gujarat, 391425, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current research endeavours are progressively focussing towards discovering sustainable methods for synthesising eco-friendly materials. In this environment, nanotechnology has emerged as a key frontier, especially in bioremediation and biotechnology. A few areas of nanotechnology including membrane technology, sophisticated oxidation processes, and biosensors. It is possible to create nanoparticles (NPs) via physical, chemical, or biological pathways in a variety of sizes and forms. These days, the investigation of plants as substitutes for NP synthesis methods has drawn a lot of interest. Toxic water contaminants such as methyl blue have been shown to be removed upto 70% by nanoparticles. In our article, we aimed at focussing the environmental sustainability and cost-effectiveness towards the green synthesis of nanoparticles. Furthermore it offers a comprehensive thorough summary of green NP synthesis methods which can be distinguished by their ease of use, financial sustainability, and environmentally favourable utilization of plant extracts. This study highlights how green synthesis methods have the potential to transform manufacturing of NPs while adhering to environmental stewardship principles and resource efficiency.

Indexed as

BioremediationGreen nanotechnologyGreen NPsNanoparticlesWastewater

Identifiers

PMID38332899
PMCPMC10850744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.