Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38332848›Full record

ArticleHRB open research2023

Prevalence and incidence of cancer amongst adults with intellectual disability - a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Martin McMahon, Louise Lynch, Andrew Wormald, Jessica Eustace-Cook, Mary McCarron, Philip McCallion, Valerie Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HRB open research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martin McMahonSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, The University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, D02 PN40, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3340-9537
Louise LynchSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, The University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, D02 PN40, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2209-4859
Andrew WormaldTrinity Centre for Ageing with Intellectual Disability (TCAID), The University of Dublin Trinity College, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Dublin, Ireland.
Jessica Eustace-CookSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, The University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, D02 PN40, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-5477
Mary McCarronSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, The University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, D02 PN40, Ireland.
Philip McCallionTrinity Centre for Ageing with Intellectual Disability (TCAID), The University of Dublin Trinity College, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-6399
Valerie SmithSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, The University of Dublin Trinity College, Dublin, D02 PN40, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2249-6038

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with intellectual disabilities have poorer health and die earlier than their peers without identified disabilities. This difference represents a significant inequality. Until recently, it was considered that cancer was less common in this population, mainly because they did not live long enough to develop age-related cancers. However, recent evidence has identified that people with intellectual disabilities may be at an increased risk of developing cancer but more likely to present for medical treatment at a later stage when cancer has spread. Nonetheless, the evidence is lacking and there is a need to understand the prevalence and incidence of cancer and subtypes of cancer in adults with intellectual disabilities. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis will be undertaken to investigate the prevalence and incidence of cancer and subtypes of cancer in adults with an intellectual disability. The JBI Systematic reviews of prevalence and incidence and the PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed to develop this protocol. Electronic databases will be searched using predefined search terms to identify relevant studies using the Condition Context Population (CoCoPop) framework. Eligible studies should be observational and have published baseline data that have estimated or presented data on the prevalence or incidence of cancer in adults with intellectual disabilities. To assess the methodological quality of studies included in this review a modified version of the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data will be used. Prevalence and incidence proportions will be analysed separately with individual study data being pooled using the DerSimonian-Laird proportion method and a random effects meta-analysis will be undertaken. Discussion: This review will advance the epidemiological evidence to identify where targeted cancer care interventions are needed to help reduce the inequalities that this population experiences. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023423584.

Indexed as

cancerIntellectual disabilityneoplasmssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38332848
PMCPMC10850849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.