Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38332804›Full record

ArticleJournal of planning literature2024

Planning for Play? A Systematic Literature Review.

Maxwell Hartt, Claire Lee, Madison Empey-Salisbury

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of planning literature, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maxwell HarttDepartment of Geography and Planning, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1748-7890
Claire LeePlanning & Development, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, Vancouver, Canada.
Madison Empey-SalisburySchool of Urban and Regional Planning, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Play has well-established physical and mental benefits for people of all ages. Urban spaces, such as parks, provide important public arenas in which to play. But to what extent do planners or planning scholarship focus on facilitating play? Our systematic literature review of 3,800 articles in nineteen academic planning journals returned 126 articles related to play. We found that the planning for play literature is an emerging discourse overwhelmingly focused on children and the physical design of urban spaces in predominantly English-speaking nations. The study identifies gaps in the planning for play literature and outlines recommendations for future research.

Indexed as

age-friendly citieschild-friendly citiesplayplayful citiessystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID38332804
PMCPMC10847012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.