Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38332769›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Minimal impacts of invasive

Susan M Swensen, Adriana Morales Gomez, Colette Piasecki-Masters, Ngawang Chime, Abigail R Wine, Nandadevi Cortes Rodriguez, James Conklin, Peter J Melcher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Organelle genomes of twoFrontiers in plant science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan M SwensenDepartment of Biology, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Adriana Morales GomezDepartment of Biology, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Colette Piasecki-MastersDepartment of Biology, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Ngawang ChimeDepartment of Biology, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Abigail R WineDepartment of Biology, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Nandadevi Cortes RodriguezDepartment of Biology, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
James ConklinDepartment of Biology, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Peter J MelcherDepartment of Biology, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.
Ithaca College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: Insect visitation rates were measured at sites where species co-occur and where only the native occurs. Where species cooccur, insect visitors were captured, identified and analyzed for the pollen they carry. Pollen found on open-pollinated flowers was analyzed to assess pollen movement between the two species. We also compared floral nectar from each species by measuring volume, sugar content, and presence and proportions of amine group containing constituents (AGCCs). Results: Our results demonstrate that both species share insect visitors providing the context for possible pollinator competition, yet significant differences in visitation frequency were not found. We found evidence of asymmetrical heterospecific pollen deposition in the native species, suggesting a possible reproductive impact. Insect visitation rates for the native were not significantly different between invaded and uninvaded sites, suggesting that the invasive Conclusion: Our analysis finds no evidence for pollination competition and therefore

Indexed as

GoodeniaceaeinvasivepollinationScaevola plumieriScaevola taccada

Identifiers

PMID38332769
PMCPMC10850390
OpenAlexW4391227708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.