Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38332410›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2024

Contrast-enhanced mammography BI-RADS: a case-based approach to radiology reporting.

Luca Nicosia, Ottavia Battaglia, Massimo Venturini, Federico Fontana, Manuela Minenna, Aurora Pesenti, Diana Budascu, Filippo Pesapane, Anna Carla Bozzini, Maria Pizzamiglio and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Luca NicosiaBreast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy. luca.nicosia@ieo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3979-8075
Ottavia BattagliaPostgraduation School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Massimo VenturiniDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, 21100, Varese, Italy.
Federico FontanaDiagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, Circolo Hospital, ASST Sette Laghi, 21100, Varese, Italy.
Manuela MinennaSchool of Medicine and Surgery, Insubria University, 21100, Varese, Italy.
Aurora PesentiDepartment of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Diana BudascuDepartment of Radiology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Filippo PesapaneBreast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Anna Carla BozziniBreast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Maria PizzamiglioBreast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Lorenza MeneghettiBreast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Antuono LatronicoBreast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Giulia SignorelliBreast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Luciano MarianoRadiology Department, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10129, Turin, Italy.
Enrico CassanoBreast Imaging Division, Radiology Department, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is a relatively recent diagnostic technique increasingly being utilized in clinical practice. Until recently, there was a lack of standardized reporting for CEM findings. However, this has changed with the publication of a supplement in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). A comprehensive understanding of CEM is essential for further enhancing its role in both screening and managing patients with breast malignancies. CEM can also be beneficial for problem-solving, improving the management of uncertain breast findings. Practitioners in this field should become more cognizant of how and when to employ this technique and interpret the various CEM findings. This paper aims to outline the key findings in the updated version of the BI-RADS specifically dedicated to CEM. Additionally, it will present some clinical cases commonly encountered in clinical practice.Critical relevance statement Standardized reporting and a thorough understanding of CEM findings are pivotal for advancing the role of CEM in screening and managing breast cancer patients. This standardization contributes significantly to integrating CEM as an essential component of daily clinical practice.Key points • A complete knowledge and understanding of the findings outlined in the new BI-RADS CEM are necessary for accurate reporting.• BI-RADS CEM supplement is intuitive and practical to use.• Standardization of the CEM findings enables more accurate patient management.

Indexed as

Breast diseasesContrast agentMammographyQuality data reporting

Identifiers

PMID38332410
PMCPMC10853105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.