Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38332409›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2024

Network Representation of fMRI Data Using Visibility Graphs: The Impact of Motion and Test-Retest Reliability.

Govinda R Poudel, Prabin Sharma, Valentina Lorenzetti, Nicholas Parsons, Ester Cerin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Govinda R PoudelMary Mackillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, 215 Spring Street, Melbourne, 3000, Australia. Govinda.Poudel@acu.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0043-7531
Prabin SharmaDepartment of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA. Prabin.Sharma001@umb.edu.
Valentina LorenzettiNeuroscience of Addiction and Mental Health Program, The Healthy Brain and Mind Research Centre, School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia. Valentina.Lorenzetti@acu.edu.au.
Nicholas ParsonsSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. nicholas.parsons@monash.edu.
Ester CerinMary Mackillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, 215 Spring Street, Melbourne, 3000, Australia. ester.cerin@acu.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visibility graphs provide a novel approach for analysing time-series data. Graph theoretical analysis of visibility graphs can provide new features for data mining applications in fMRI. However, visibility graphs features have not been used widely in the field of neuroscience. This is likely due to a lack of understanding of their robustness in the presence of noise (e.g., motion) and their test-retest reliability. In this study, we investigated visibility graph properties of fMRI data in the human connectome project (N = 1010) and tested their sensitivity to motion and test-retest reliability. We also characterised the strength of connectivity obtained using degree synchrony of visibility graphs. We found that strong correlation (r > 0.5) between visibility graph properties, such as the number of communities and average degrees, and motion in the fMRI data. The test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)) of graph theoretical features was high for the average degrees (0.74, 95% CI = [0.73, 0.75]), and moderate for clustering coefficient (0.43, 95% CI = [0.41, 0.44]) and average path length (0.41, 95% CI = [0.38, 0.44]). Functional connectivity between brain regions was measured by correlating the visibility graph degrees. However, the strength of correlation was found to be moderate to low (r < 0.35). These findings suggest that even small movement in fMRI data can strongly influence robustness and reliability of visibility graph features, thus, requiring robust motion correction strategies prior to data analysis. Further studies are necessary for better understanding of the potential application of visibility graph features in fMRI.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsTime FactorsBrain network analysisResting-state fMRITimeseries featuresVisibility graph

Identifiers

PMID38332409
PMCPMC11021232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.