Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38332404›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2024

Basal Cell Carcinoma Diagnosis with Fusion of Deep Learning and Telangiectasia Features.

Akanksha Maurya, R Joe Stanley, Hemanth Y Aradhyula, Norsang Lama, Anand K Nambisan, Gehana Patel, Daniyal Saeed, Samantha Swinfard, Colin Smith, Sadhika Jagannathan and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Concordance in Basal Cell Carcinoma Diagnosis. Building a Proper Standard Reference to Train Artificial Intelligence Tools.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Akanksha MauryaMissouri University of Science &Technology, Rolla, MO, 65209, USA.
R Joe StanleyMissouri University of Science &Technology, Rolla, MO, 65209, USA. stanleyj@mst.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0477-3388
Hemanth Y AradhyulaFord Motor Company, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan, USA.
Norsang LamaMissouri University of Science &Technology, Rolla, MO, 65209, USA.
Anand K NambisanMissouri University of Science &Technology, Rolla, MO, 65209, USA.
Gehana PatelUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Daniyal SaeedUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Samantha SwinfardMissouri University of Science &Technology, Rolla, MO, 65209, USA.
Colin SmithA.T. Still University of Health Sciences, Kirksville, MO, USA.
Sadhika JagannathanKansas City Medical School, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Jason R HagertyS&A Technologies, Rolla, MO, USA.
William V StoeckerS&A Technologies, Rolla, MO, USA.
Missouri University of Science and Technology · USSS&C Technologies (United States) · USUniversity of Missouri · USA.T. Still University · USFord Motor Company (United States) · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, deep learning (DL) has been used extensively and successfully to diagnose different cancers in dermoscopic images. However, most approaches lack clinical inputs supported by dermatologists that could aid in higher accuracy and explainability. To dermatologists, the presence of telangiectasia, or narrow blood vessels that typically appear serpiginous or arborizing, is a critical indicator of basal cell carcinoma (BCC). Exploiting the feature information present in telangiectasia through a combination of DL-based techniques could create a pathway for both, improving DL results as well as aiding dermatologists in BCC diagnosis. This study demonstrates a novel "fusion" technique for BCC vs non-BCC classification using ensemble learning on a combination of (a) handcrafted features from semantically segmented telangiectasia (U-Net-based) and (b) deep learning features generated from whole lesion images (EfficientNet-B5-based). This fusion method achieves a binary classification accuracy of 97.2%, with a 1.3% improvement over the corresponding DL-only model, on a holdout test set of 395 images. An increase of 3.7% in sensitivity, 1.5% in specificity, and 1.5% in precision along with an AUC of 0.99 was also achieved. Metric improvements were demonstrated in three stages: (1) the addition of handcrafted telangiectasia features to deep learning features, (2) including areas near telangiectasia (surround areas), (3) discarding the noisy lower-importance features through feature importance. Another novel approach to feature finding with weak annotations through the examination of the surrounding areas of telangiectasia is offered in this study. The experimental results show state-of-the-art accuracy and precision in the diagnosis of BCC, compared to three benchmark techniques. Further exploration of deep learning techniques for individual dermoscopy feature detection is warranted.

Indexed as

Basal Cell CarcinomaDeep LearningSkin NeoplasmsTelangiectasisDermoscopyHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSensitivity and SpecificityBasal cell carcinomaDeep learningDermoscopyFusionTelangiectasiaTransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID38332404
PMCPMC11169204
OpenAlexW4391659174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.