ArticleInsights into imaging2024
Diagnostic accuracy of MRI, CT, and [
Article in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Construction and validation of a novel prognostic risk model in cervical cancer: integrating lactylation-related genes linked to radiotherapy‑associated transcriptional changes.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Dual-mode 3D shear wave elastography with qualitative and quantitative assessment improves diagnosis of inguinal lymph node metastasis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Schwannoma Mimicking Neck Nodal Metastasis on F-18 FDG PET/CT in Cervical Cancer: A Case Report with a Multimodal Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- High LRIG1 expression predicts lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cervical cancer.FEBS open bio · 2025Article
- Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix (NECC): A retrospective study of 175 Chinese patients.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025Article
- Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Multiparametric MRI in Gynecologic Oncology and Precision Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the Frequency and Patterns of Cervical Cancer Recurrence After Treatment Using ^18F-FDG PET-CT: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Reliability study of MRI in detecting lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer: a multi-center retrospective study result analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Prediction of cervical cancer lymph node metastasis based on multisequence magnetic resonance imaging radiomics and deep learning features: a dual-center study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Added value of radiological staging to clinical examination in different histopathological subtypes of uterine cervical cancer: A retrospective study.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2025Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Management of Women with Low-Risk Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Current Paradigm and Future Directions in the Management of Nodal Disease in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Partial verification bias correction using scaled inverse probability resampling for binary diagnostic tests.PloS one · 2025Article
- Comparison of [Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Comparative Diagnostic Value of 18F-FDG-PET-CT and Intraoperative Examination in Cervical Cancer Staging.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesImaging is increasingly used to assess lymph node involvement in clinically early-stage cervical cancer. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI, CT, and [
methodsWomen with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer and pretreatment imaging between 2009 and 2017 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patient-based and region-based (i.e. pelvic and common iliac) nodal status was extracted from radiology reports. Pathology results were considered the reference standard for calculating accuracy indices. Multiple imputation was used for missing pathology to limit verification bias risk.
resultsNodal assessment was performed in 1676 patients with MRI, 926 with CT, and 379 with [
conclusions[ CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Accurate assessment of the nodal status in clinically early-stage cervical cancer is essential for tumour staging, treatment decision making and prognosis. KEY POINTS: • The accuracy of MRI, CT or [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.