ArticlePharmaceutical research2024
Structure Based Machine Learning Prediction of Retention Times for LC Method Development of Pharmaceuticals.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Active Learning Improves Ionization Efficiency Predictions and Quantification in Nontargeted LC/HRMS.Analytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Predictions of Chromatography Methods by Chemical Structure Similarity to Accelerate High-Throughput Medicinal Chemistry.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSignificant resources are spent on developing robust liquid chromatography (LC) methods with optimum conditions for all project in the pipeline. Although, data-driven computer assisted modelling has been implemented to shorten the method development timelines, these modelling approaches require project-specific screening data to model retention time (RT) as function of method parameters. Sometimes method re-development is required, leading to additional investments and redundant laboratory work. Cheminformatics techniques have been successfully used to predict the RT of metabolites & other component mixtures for similar use cases. Here we will show that these techniques can be used to model structurally diverse molecules and predictions of these models trained on multiple LC conditions can be used for downstream data-driven modelling.
methodsThe Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) was used to calculate over 800 descriptors using the strucutres of the analytes. These descriptors were used to model the RT of the analytes under four chromatographic conditions. These models were then used to create data-driven models using LC-SIM.
resultsA structural-based Random Forest (RF) model outperformed other techniques in cross-validation studies and predicted the RTs of a randomized test set with a median percentage error less than 4% for all LC conditions. RTs predicted by this structure-based model were used to fit a data-driven model that identifies optimum LC conditions without any additional experimental work.
conclusionsThese results show that small training sets yield pharmaceutically relevant models when used in a combination of structure-based and data-driven model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38332389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.