Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38332355›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2024

Current and emerging 3D visualization technologies in radiology.

Zachary Abramson, Dylan Thompson, Chris Goode, Cara E Morin, Sarah Daniels, Asim F Choudhri, Andrew M Davidoff

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zachary AbramsonDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA. Zachary.Abramson@stjude.org.ORCID 0000-0001-7875-1187
Dylan ThompsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The University of Memphis, 3806 Norriswood Avenue, Memphis, TN, USA.
Chris GoodeDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, 38105, USA.
Cara E MorinDepartment of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, 3333 Burnet Ave, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Sarah DanielsChild Life Program, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, USA.
Asim F ChoudhriDepartment of Radiology, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 50 N. Dunlap St., Memphis, TN, USA.
Andrew M DavidoffDepartment of Surgery, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the field of three-dimensional (3D) visualization rapidly advances, how healthcare professionals perceive and interact with real and virtual objects becomes increasingly complex. Lack of clear vocabulary to navigate the changing landscape of 3D visualization hinders clinical and scientific advancement, particularly within the field of radiology. In this article, we provide foundational definitions and illustrative examples for 3D visualization in clinical care, with a focus on the pediatric patient population. We also describe how understanding 3D visualization tools enables better alignment of hardware and software products with intended use-cases, thereby maximizing impact for patients, families, and healthcare professionals.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalRadiologyChildHumansPediatricsSoftware3D printingAugmented realityPre-operative planningThree-dimensionalVirtual realityVisualization

Identifiers

PMID38332355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.