ArticleInternational ophthalmology2024
Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness between monocular and alternating exotropia in patients with intermittent exotropia.
Article in International ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate differences in intraocular structure based on the presence or absence of fixation preference in children with intermittent exotropia (IXT) by comparing the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL).
methodsFrom October 2018 to March 2022, RNFL thickness was retrospectively analyzed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Participants had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20, refractive errors close to emmetropia, and no anisometropia. The patients were divided into monocular and alternating exotropia groups through a cover-uncover test. The average and sectoral thickness of the RNFL in both groups were compared.
resultsThe average global thickness and average thickness of each of the six sectors of the RNFL did not significantly differ between dominant and non-dominant eyes in the monocular exotropia group and between right and left eyes in the alternating exotropia group. The thickness did not significantly differ between the monocular exotropia group and the right or left eye of the alternating exotropia group. Interocular differences in RNFL thickness were negative in the monocular exotropia group (dominant eye-non-dominant eye) and positive in the alternating exotropia group (right eye-left eye) for the average, inferonasal, and inferior sectors, exhibiting statistically significant between-group differences (p = 0.019, p = 0.003, p = 0.023, respectively).
conclusionsIn children with IXT without obvious refractive error, there was a significant interocular difference in RNFL thickness of the average, inferonasal, and inferior sectors between monocular and alternating exotropia groups. The presence of fixation preference may affect RNFL thickness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.