ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2024
Design and Evaluation of a Dual-Sensitive In Situ Gel for the Controlled Release of Pranoprofen.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a Temperature and pH Dual-Sensitive In-Situ Gel for Treating Allergic Conjunctivitis.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2024Article
- The efficacy of tobramycin dexamethasone combined with pranoprofen in middle-aged and elderly post-cataract patients and the value of improving inflammatory factor levels.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, the marketed ophthalmic preparations of pranoprofen (PF) are mainly eye drops, but due to the special clearance mechanism of the eye and corneal reflex, the contact time between the drug and the focal site is short, most of the drug is lost, and the bioavailability is less than 5%. In the present study, an in situ gel eye drop containing no bacteriostatic agent and sensitive to temperature and ions was designed for delivery of PF. It was demonstrated to meet the criteria for ophthalmic preparations by characterization such as appearance content sterility. Ocular irritation tests showed a favorable safety profile. In vivo ocular retention time experiments showed that the ocular retention time of the pranoprofen gel was 4.41 times longer than that of commercially available drops (Pranopulin®), and the nasal tear excretion of the pranoprofen gel was lower than that of Pranopulin®, which suggests that the drug loss was reduced relative to that of the drops. The efficacy of the pranoprofen gel against tincture of cayenne pepper-induced corneal and conjunctival inflammation was examined using Pranopulin® as a control and in conjunction with inflammation scores, H&E slice results, and levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. The results showed that pranoprofen gel and Pranololin® had significant efficacy in the treatment of corneal and conjunctival inflammation, and the anti-inflammatory effect of pranoprofen gel was superior to that of Pranololin®. This study provides a new option for the treatment of corneal and conjunctival inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.