Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38332220›Full record

ArticleSports medicine - open2024

Does Advanced Footwear Technology Improve Track and Road Racing Performance? An Explorative Analysis Based on the 100 Best Yearly Performances in the World Between 2010 and 2022.

Steffen Willwacher, Patrick Mai, Janina Helwig, Markus Hipper, Burkay Utku, Johanna Robbin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine - open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
20.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Quo vadis advanced footwear technology research?Journal of sport and health science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steffen WillwacherInstitute of Advanced Biomechanics and Motion Studies, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Campus West, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 77656, Offenburg, Germany. steffen.willwacher@hs-offenburg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1303-3165
Patrick MaiInstitute of Advanced Biomechanics and Motion Studies, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Campus West, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 77656, Offenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7076-651X
Janina HelwigInstitute of Advanced Biomechanics and Motion Studies, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Campus West, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 77656, Offenburg, Germany.
Markus HipperInstitute of Advanced Biomechanics and Motion Studies, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Campus West, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 77656, Offenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8774-7570
Burkay UtkuInstitute of Advanced Biomechanics and Motion Studies, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Campus West, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 77656, Offenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6423-723X
Johanna RobbinInstitute of Advanced Biomechanics and Motion Studies, Offenburg University of Applied Sciences, Campus West, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 77656, Offenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2564-7110
Offenburg University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced footwear technology (AFT) is currently being debated in sports. There is a direct evidence that distance running in AFT improves running economy. In addition, there is indirect evidence from competition performance for improved running performance from using AFTs in middle- and long-distance running and sprinting events. However, the extent to which world-class performance is affected across the full range of track and road racing events between genders has not been systematically analyzed. This study examined publicly available performance datasets of annual best track and road performances for evidence of potential systematic performance effects following the introduction of AFT. The analysis was based on the 100 best performances per year for men and women in outdoor events from 2010 to 2022, provided by the world governing body of athletics (World Athletics). We found evidence of progressing improvements in track and road running performances after the introduction of AFT for road races in 2016 and AFT for track racing in 2019. This evidence is more pronounced for distances longer than 1500 m in women and longer than 5000 m in men. Women seem to benefit more from AFT in distance running events than men. For the sprint events (100 m to 400 m hurdles), the peak performance gains in 2021 and 2022 compared to the pre-AFT period ranged from 0.6 to 1.1% and from 0.4 to 0.7% for women and men, respectively. For middle-distance events (400 m to 3000 m steeplechase), peak performance gains ranged from 0.6 to 1.9% and from 0.6 to 0.7% for women and men, respectively. For distances from 5000 m to the marathon, performance gains ranged from 2.2% to 3.5% and 0.7% to 1.4% for women and men, respectively. While the observational study design limits causal inference, this study provides a database on potential systematic performance effects after introducing advanced shoes/spikes in track and road running events in world-class athletes. Further research is needed to examine the underlying mechanisms and, in particular, potential gender differences in the performance effects of AFT.

Indexed as

LocomotionRunningRunning performanceRunning shoeSpikesSports performanceSprinting

Identifiers

PMID38332220
PMCPMC10853158
OpenAlexW4391642657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.