Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38332175›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

First clinical experiences of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer using the hinotori™ surgical robot system.

Seiji Inoue, Masaya Nakauchi, Yusuke Umeki, Kazumitsu Suzuki, Akiko Serizawa, Shingo Akimoto, Yusuke Watanabe, Tsuyoshi Tanaka, Susumu Shibasaki, Kazuki Inaba and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Evaluation of the hinotoriJournal of robotic surgery · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seiji InoueDepartment of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Masaya NakauchiDepartment of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan. naka57ma38@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1338-8556
Yusuke UmekiDepartment of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Kazumitsu SuzukiDepartment of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Akiko SerizawaDepartment of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Shingo AkimotoDepartment of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Yusuke WatanabeDepartment of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Tsuyoshi TanakaDepartment of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Susumu ShibasakiDepartment of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Kazuki InabaDepartment of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Ichiro UyamaDepartment of Advanced Robotic and Endoscopic Surgery, Fujita Health University, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake, Toyoake, Aichi, 470-1192, Japan.
Koichi SudaDepartment of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Fujita Health University · JPFujita Health University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the da Vinci™ Surgical System is the most predominantly used surgical robot worldwide, other surgical robots are being developed. The Japanese surgical robot hinotori™ Surgical Robot System was launched and approved for clinical use in Japan in November 2022. We performed the first robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer using hinotori in the world. Here, we report our initial experience and evaluation of the feasibility and safety of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer using hinotori.

methodsA single-institution retrospective study was conducted. Between November 2022 and October 2023, 24 patients with gastric cancer underwent robotic gastrectomy with hinotori. Five ports, including one for an assistant, were placed in the upper abdomen, and gastric resection with standard lymphadenectomy and intracorporeal reconstruction were performed. The primary endpoint was the postoperative complication rate within 30 days after surgery. The secondary outcomes were surgical outcomes, including intraoperative adverse events, operative time, blood loss, and the number of dissected nodes.

resultsOf the 24 patients, 16 (66.7%) were male. The median age and body mass index were 73.5 years and 22.9 kg/m

conclusionsThis study found that robotic gastrectomy with standard lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer using hinotori can be safely performed.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresStomach NeoplasmsFemaleGastrectomyHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGastrectomyGastric CancerLymphadenectomyRobotic surgical procedure

Identifiers

PMID38332175
OpenAlexW4391637878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.