ReviewNature ecology & evolution2024
Roles of the Red List of Ecosystems in the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.
Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in the transformative potential of action proposals in Finnish Red Lists from 1986 to 2019.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Synthesizing the ecosystem services benefits, synergies and trade-offs of forest restoration in China.npj biodiversity · 2026Review
- Changes in Key Biodiversity Area networks following national comprehensive assessments.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
- Applying the IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology to classify, describe, and map ecosystems based on regional data and Indigenous knowledge.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- An update to the global Critical Habitat screening layer.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Effect of primate protection on threatened and endemic vertebrates, plants, ecosystem services, and future climate refugia.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- Accounting for functionality in the identification of global conservation priorities: promises and pitfalls.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Synergies and complementarities between ecosystem accounting and the Red List of Ecosystems.Nature ecology & evolution · 2024Review
- Using the Red List of Ecosystems and the Nature-based Solutions Global Standard as an integrated process for climate change adaptation in the Andean high mountains.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) of the UN Convention on Biological Diversity set the agenda for global aspirations and action to reverse biodiversity loss. The GBF includes an explicit goal for maintaining and restoring biodiversity, encompassing ecosystems, species and genetic diversity (goal A), targets for ecosystem protection and restoration and headline indicators to track progress and guide action
Indexed as
Identifiers
38332025What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.