Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38331904›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

How the commercial virtual care industry gathers, uses and values patient data: a Canadian qualitative study.

Sheryl Spithoff, Brenda McPhail, Leslie Vesely, Robyn K Rowe, Lana Mogic, Quinn Grundy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Government partnerships with corporate virtual primary care.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2025
    Article
  4. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien
    Article
  5. Typology of virtual primary care in Canada: Making the implications clear.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sheryl SpithoffWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada sheryl.spithoff@wchospital.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6965-473X
Brenda McPhailFaculty of Social Sciences, McMaster University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leslie VeselyWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Robyn K RoweDepartment of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Lana MogicWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Quinn GrundyFaculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7640-8614

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo understand and report on the direct-to-consumer virtual care industry in Canada, focusing on how companies collect, use and value patient data.

designQualitative study using situational analysis methodology.

settingCanadian for-profit virtual care industry.

participants18 individuals employed by or affiliated with the Canadian virtual care industry.

methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted between October 2021 and January 2022 and publicly available documents on websites of commercial virtual care platforms were retrieved. Analysis was informed by situational analysis, a constructivist grounded theory methodology, with a continuous and iterative process of data collection and analysis; theoretical sampling and creation of theoretical concepts to explain findings.

resultsParticipants described how companies in the virtual care industry highly valued patient data. Companies used data collected as patients accessed virtual care platforms and registered for services to generate revenue, often by marketing other products and services. In some cases, virtual care companies were funded by pharmaceutical companies to analyse data collected when patients interacted with a healthcare provider and adjust care pathways with the goal of increasing uptake of a drug or vaccine. Participants described these business practices as expected and appropriate, but some were concerned about patient privacy, industry influence over care and risks to marginalised communities. They described how patients may have agreed to these uses of their data because of high levels of trust in the Canadian health system, problematic consent processes and a lack of other options for care.

conclusionsPatients, healthcare providers and policy-makers should be aware that the direct-to-consumer virtual care industry in Canada highly values patient data and appears to view data as a revenue stream. The industry's data handling practices of this sensitive information, in the context of providing a health service, have implications for patient privacy, autonomy and quality of care.

Indexed as

IndustryMarketingCanadaHumansInformation technologyMEDICAL ETHICSOrganisation of health servicesQUALITATIVE RESEARCHTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID38331904
PMCPMC10860095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.