Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38331837›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Hybrid AI-enhanced lightning flash prediction in the medium-range forecast horizon.

Mattia Cavaiola, Federico Cassola, Davide Sacchetti, Francesco Ferrari, Andrea Mazzino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mattia CavaiolaDICCA, Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Via Montallegro 1, Genova, 16145, Italy. mattia.cavaiola@sp.ismar.cnr.it.
Federico CassolaARPAL, Regional Agency for Environmental Protection Liguria, Genova, Italy.
Davide SacchettiARPAL, Regional Agency for Environmental Protection Liguria, Genova, Italy.
Francesco FerrariDICCA, Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Via Montallegro 1, Genova, 16145, Italy.
Andrea MazzinoDICCA, Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Via Montallegro 1, Genova, 16145, Italy. andrea.mazzino@unige.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0170-2891

Funding

Compagnia di San Paolo (Fondazione Compagnia di San Paolo) AIxtreme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional fully-deterministic algorithms, which rely on physical equations and mathematical models, are the backbone of many scientific disciplines for decades. These algorithms are based on well-established principles and laws of physics, enabling a systematic and predictable approach to problem-solving. On the other hand, AI-based strategies emerge as a powerful tool for handling vast amounts of data and extracting patterns and relationships that might be challenging to identify through traditional algorithms. Here, we bridge these two realms by using AI to find an optimal mapping of meteorological features predicted two days ahead by the state-of-the-art numerical weather prediction model by the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) into lightning flash occurrence. The prediction capability of the resulting AI-enhanced algorithm turns out to be significantly higher than that of the fully-deterministic algorithm employed in the ECMWF model. A remarkable Recall peak of about 95% within the 0-24 h forecast interval is obtained. This performance surpasses the 85% achieved by the ECMWF model at the same Precision of the AI algorithm.

Identifiers

PMID38331837
PMCPMC10853497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.