Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38331769›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024

Monoclonal antibodies in idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: a scoping review.

Andrea Dionelly Murillo, Ana Isabel Castrillon, Carlos Daniel Serrano, Liliana Fernandez-Trujillo

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fibrotic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: from inflammation to fibrosis and therapeutic implications.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea Dionelly MurilloDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allergology Service, Fundación Valle del Lili, Carrera 98 # 18-49, Cali, 760032, Colombia.
Ana Isabel CastrillonClinical Research Center, Fundación Valle del Lili, Carrera 98 # 18-49, Cali, 760032, Colombia.
Carlos Daniel SerranoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allergology Service, Fundación Valle del Lili, Carrera 98 # 18-49, Cali, 760032, Colombia.
Liliana Fernandez-TrujilloFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Icesi, Calle 18 # 122-135, Cali, 760032, Colombia. liliana.fernandez@fvl.org.co.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0789-9154
Fundación Valle del Lili · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) is a rare disease characterized by pulmonary radiological alterations, peripheral eosinophilia, and demonstrated pulmonary eosinophilia. Oral steroids (OSs) are the standard management, but relapses occur in up to 50% of patients during the decrease or suspension of steroids, usually requiring reinitiation of treatment, exposing patients to secondary events derived from the management. Management with monoclonal antibodies has been proposed in these cases to control the disease and limit the secondary effects. The objective is to describe the extent and type of evidence regarding the use of monoclonal antibodies for ICEP.

methodsA panoramic review of the literature was performed. Observational and experimental studies of pediatric and adult populations that managed recurrent ICEP with monoclonal antibodies were included. Data search, selection, and extraction were performed by two independent reviewers.

results937 studies were found. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 titles remained for the final analysis: a retrospective, observational, real-life study, two case series publications, and 34 case reports published in academic poster sessions and letters to the editor. In general, the use of monoclonal antibodies approved for severe asthma could be useful for the control of ICEP, since most of the results show a good response for clinical and radiological outcomes. Biological drugs seem to be a safer option for controlling relapses in ICEP, allowing lowering/suspension of OSs, and sometimes replacing them in patients intolerant to them, patients with significant comorbidities, and patients who have already developed adverse events.

conclusionThe extent of the evidence supporting management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies against IL-5 and IgE (omalizumab) is limited, but it could be promising in patients who present frequent relapses, in cortico-dependent individuals, or in patients in whom the use of steroids is contraindicated. The extent of the evidence for management with dupilumab is more limited. Studies with better design and structure are needed to evaluate quality of life and outcomes during a clear follow-up period. To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review of the literature showing the extent of the evidence for the management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies.

Indexed as

AsthmaPulmonary EosinophiliaAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalChildHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuality of LifeRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSteroidsAntibodies, MonoclonalSteroidsCarrington syndromeEosinophilic pneumoniaIdiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumoniaMonoclonal antibodiesPulmonary eosinophiliaSystemic corticosteroids

Identifiers

PMID38331769
PMCPMC10851541
OpenAlexW4391648117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.