Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38331762›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Triage practices for emergency care delivery: a qualitative study among febrile patients and healthcare workers in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal.

Bipin Adhikari, Lava Shrestha, Manjita Bajracharya, Nishika Aryal, Anuja Rajbhandari, Ramesh K Maharjan, Santa K Das, Jyotshna Sapkota, Kevin K A Tetteh, Debashish Das

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Bipin Adhikari *Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Lava Shrestha *Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Manjita BajracharyaEmergency Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Nishika Aryal *Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Anuja Rajbhandari *Institute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ramesh K MaharjanEmergency Medicine, Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Santa K DasInstitute of Medicine, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Jyotshna SapkotaFIND, Campus Biotech, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kevin K A TettehFIND, Campus Biotech, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland.
Debashish DasFIND, Campus Biotech, Chemin des Mines 9, 1202, Geneva, Switzerland. Debashish.Das@finddx.org.
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics · CHTribhuvan University Teaching Hospital · NPMahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImproving screening and triage practices is essential for early severity assessments at the first point of contact and ensuring timely attention by healthcare workers (HCWs). The main objective of this study was to explore the triage process among febrile patients and HCWs in the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care hospital in a resource-constrained setting.

methodsThis qualitative study was conducted from March to May 2023 at the ED of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (TUTH), Nepal. The study included in-depth interviews with febrile patients (n = 15) and HCWs (n = 15). Additionally, direct observation notes (n = 20) were collected to document the triage process and patients' experiences in the ED. Data underwent thematic analysis using the Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) approach.

resultsThe ED of TUTH offered comprehensive triage services with clear delineation for the severity of febrile patients in line with the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Nonetheless, challenges and constraints were identified. In the ED, evenings were generally the busiest period, and the triage process was not thorough during night shifts. Perception of triage was limited among patients and variable among HCWs. Digitalizing recordings of patient information including payment was deemed necessary for effective management of patients' waiting times at the triage station. High patient throughput added pressure on HCWs and had a potential influence on the delivery of services. Availability of medical equipment and space were also identified as challenges, with patients sometimes compelled to share beds. There were constraints related to waste disposal, hygiene, cleanliness, and the availability and maintenance of washrooms. Febrile patients experienced delays in receiving timely consultations and laboratory investigation reports, which affected their rapid diagnosis and discharge; nonetheless, patients were satisfied with the overall healthcare services received in the ED.

conclusionsImproving current triage management requires resource organization, including optimizing the waiting time of patients through a digitalized system. Urgent priorities involve upgrading visitor facilities, patient consultations, laboratory investigations, hygiene, and sanitation. HCWs' recommendations to resource the ED with more equipment, space, and beds and a dedicated triage officer to ensure 24-hour service, together with training and incentives, warrant further attention.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesTriageDelivery of Health CareEmergency Service, HospitalHealth PersonnelHospitals, UniversityHumansNepalTertiary Care CentersEmergency departmentIn-depth interviewPatient journeyTriage

Identifiers

PMID38331762
PMCPMC10851527
OpenAlexW4391646831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.