ReviewBMC plant biology2024
Application of genome editing techniques to regulate gene expression in crops.
Review in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Omics approaches to unveil biotic stress responses in olive: current knowledge and the future.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Intermolecular-Interaction-Driven Adaptive Remodeling: A Network Perspective on Plant Abiotic Stress Responses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A NovelPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Membrane stability under heat stress: molecular signaling, lipid remodeling, and defense mechanisms in plants.Plant cell reports · 2026Review
- Novel genome editing approaches to manipulate apical meristem activity for crop yield.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Deciphering the Contribution of TATA Box and 5'UTR to Defense Signaling in Rice Under Blast Infection.Biology · 2025Review
- Floral organ development combined with pistil transcriptome analysis reveals the role of plant hormone signal transduction in the distyly of Primula vulgaris.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Innovative opportunities for gene editing technology in crop breeding: from the perspective of literature analysis.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Variability of plant transcriptomic responses under stress acclimation: a review from high throughput studies.Acta biochimica Polonica · 2024Review
- Editing of SlMYB60 Reveals a Role in Cuticle Formation in Tomato.Physiologia plantarumArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnhanced agricultural production is urgently required to meet the food demands of the increasing global population. Abundant genetic diversity is expected to accelerate crop development. In particular, the development of the CRISPR/Cas genome editing technology has greatly enhanced our ability to improve crop's genetic diversity through direct artificial gene modification. However, recent studies have shown that most crop improvement efforts using CRISPR/Cas techniques have mainly focused on the coding regions, and there is a relatively lack of studies on the regulatory regions of gene expression.
resultsThis review briefly summarizes the development of CRISPR/Cas system in the beginning. Subsequently, the importance of gene regulatory regions in plants is discussed. The review focuses on recent developments and applications of mutations in regulatory regions via CRISPR/Cas techniques in crop breeding.
conclusionFinally, an outline of perspectives for future crop breeding using genome editing technologies is provided. This review provides new research insights for crop improvement using genome editing techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.