ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2024
Using 3-D-Printed Structures to Evaluate the Potential Causes of the Color Doppler Twinkling Signature.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of Color Doppler Twinkling on Breast Biopsy Markers With Hydrostatic Overpressurization and Micro-CT Imaging.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe color Doppler twinkling artifact has been attributed to existing microbubbles or cavitation occurring on rough objects such as kidney stones, some breast biopsy clips, catheter guidewires and sandpaper. The objective was to investigate the correlation between the surface characteristics of helical constructs with different groove geometries and the occurrence of twinkling, as well as to identify locations conducive to bubble retention and/or cavitation.
methodsSix half-cylinders were created with a microscale 3-D printer with 5 µm resolution to replicate the geometry of twinkling helical constructs resembling catheter guidewires. Four copies of each marker including a non-twinkling control were printed. The half-cylinders had pitch (peak-to-peak distance) values ranging from 87.5 to 343 µm and amplitude (groove depth) values ranging from 41.5 to 209 µm. The half-cylinders were submerged in degassed water and optically imaged before and after ultrasound insonification to visualize bubbles on the cylinders. The cylinders remained submerged while scanning with the color Doppler mode at frequencies from 3.1 to 6.3 MHz using a GE Logiq E9 scanner and 9L linear array transducer.
resultsTwo markers exhibited twinkling: one with pitch-to-amplitude ratio of 174/210 µm/µm (0.8) that twinkled only with pre-existing bubbles on the marker; the other had a ratio of 87/87 µm/µm (1.00) that twinkled without pre-existing bubbles on the marker.
conclusionThis work provides strong evidence that both existing bubbles and either cavitation or ultrasound wave interactions with patterned or rough surfaces are significant factors in producing the twinkling signature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.