Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38331428›Full record

ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2024

Impact of bacterial and fungal inoculants on the resident rhizosphere microbiome and the volatilome of tomato plants under leaf herbivory stress.

Ana Shein Lee Díaz, Zhivko Minchev, Jos M Raaijmakers, María José Pozo, Paolina Garbeva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ana Shein Lee DíazDepartment of Microbial Ecology, The Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9004-9080
Zhivko MinchevDepartment of Soil Microbiology and Symbiotic Systems , Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientfícias (CSIC), Calle Prof. Albareda, 1, 18008, Granada, Spain.
Jos M RaaijmakersDepartment of Microbial Ecology, The Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.
María José PozoDepartment of Soil Microbiology and Symbiotic Systems , Estación Experimental del Zaidín, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientfícias (CSIC), Calle Prof. Albareda, 1, 18008, Granada, Spain.
Paolina GarbevaDepartment of Microbial Ecology, The Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Droevendaalsesteeg 10, 6708 PB Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2359-5719
Estación Experimental del Zaidín · ESNetherlands Institute of Ecology · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

European Union 765290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various studies have addressed the impact of microbial inoculants on the composition of the resident microbiome. How microbial inoculants impact plant metabolism and interact with the resident rhizobiota under herbivory stress remains elusive. Here, we investigated the impact of two bacterial and two fungal inoculants, inoculated as single species and as a synthetic community, on the rhizosphere microbiome and volatilome of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum) comparing nonstress conditions to exposed to leaf herbivory by Spodoptera exigua. Based on amplicon sequencing analysis, rhizobacterial community composition was significantly affected by all four inoculants and the magnitude of this effect was dependent on herbivory stress. Fungal community composition was altered by the microbial inoculants but independent of herbivory stress. The rhizosphere volatilome was impacted by the microbial inoculation and differences between treatments were evened under herbivory stress. Each microbial inoculant caused unique changes in the volatilome of stressed plants but also shared similar responses, in particular the enhanced production of dimethyl disulfide and benzothiazole. In conclusion, the introduction of microbial inoculants in the tomato rhizosphere caused unique as well as common changes in the rhizosphere microbiome and volatilome, but these changes were minor compared to the microbiome changes induced by herbivory stress.

Indexed as

Agricultural InoculantsMicrobiotaSolanum lycopersicumBacteriaHerbivoryRhizosphereSoil Microbiologyamplicon sequencinginsect herbivorymicrobial consortiamicrobial inoculationrhizosphere communitiesrhizosphere volatilome

Identifiers

PMID38331428
PMCPMC10858387
OpenAlexW4391738026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.