ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2024
Spatial nonstationarity of image noise in widefield optical imaging and its effects on cluster-based inference for resting-state functional connectivity.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intact-skull cranial windows for widefield optical imaging in juvenile mice: complications and consequences.Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) analysis with widefield optical imaging (WOI) is a potentially powerful tool to develop imaging biomarkers in mouse models of disease before translating them to human neuroimaging with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The delineation of such biomarkers depends on rigorous statistical analysis. However, statistical understanding of WOI data is limited. In particular, cluster-based analysis of neuroimaging data depends on assumptions of spatial stationarity (i.e., that the distribution of cluster sizes under the null is equal at all brain locations). Whether actual data deviate from this assumption has not previously been examined in WOI. NEW
methodIn this manuscript, we characterize the effects of spatial nonstationarity in WOI RSFC data and adapt a "two-pass" technique from fMRI to correct cluster sizes and mitigate spatial bias, both parametrically and nonparametrically. These methods are tested on multi-institutional data. RESULTS AND COMPARISON WITH EXISTING
methodsWe find that spatial nonstationarity has a substantial effect on inference in WOI RSFC data with false positives much more likely at some brain regions than others. This pattern of bias varies between imaging systems, contrasts, and mouse ages, all of which could affect experimental reproducibility if not accounted for.
conclusionsBoth parametric and nonparametric corrections for nonstationarity result in significant improvements in spatial bias. The proposed methods are simple to implement and will improve the robustness of inference in optical neuroimaging data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.